On Fri, Jul 08, 2011 at 04:03:05PM +0000, James Lowe wrote: > )If this takes more than 120 seconds of your attention (i.e. not counting > )time when lilypond compiles in the background), you're doing it wrong. > )oh, also: you can check it compiles just with "make", you don't need > )"make doc" here. > > While I get your point Mr P, if I don't create an issue then > it's 'all in emails and then someone forgets to tell Carl (by > email) who can backport this and then I get hit by a bus and no > one does the fix and so on.
ok, fair enough. > It is just tidier to keep a tracker, > I did intend to work on it straight away - I wouldn't have > bothered otherwise. Hmm. I'm really starting to worry that we're getting overly beaurocratic... but that's something we cna tweak when discussing the relevant set of policies. Cheers, - Graham _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
