On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 05:17:11PM +0100, Trevor Daniels wrote: > > >I vote against overrides; we have too many of them, and the > >difference between the old and new glyph doesnt warrrant another > >option. > > I agree. LilyPond has many glyphs. If we start using > overrides to select glyphs with minor differences where > might it end?
woah, where does this "select glyphs" come from? I was talking about something like: \override Font #'name = #"lilypond-2.14" which then gets the font (*all* glyphs) that was part of 2.14.0. Or, if there's serious oppositition to keeping this font in lilypond itself, then at least provide the mechanism to change fonts, and then James+company can add his own metafont font (the bits from 2.14.0) from some separate archive site. Cheers, - Graham _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
