Hi,
following the late discussions on bug- and -user, I stumbled over an
ugly collision between a phrasingSlur and a Slur at the beginning of a
second staff. Actually the phrasing slur tries to escape the slur but
does this in a spectacular way - while the collision is still there:
\version "2.15.5"
\relative a'
{
\key d \major
\time 2/2
\clef treble
a2.\(( d8[ cis] | \break
b2 cis4) b\) | \break
a2.\((\p d8[ cis] | \break
b2.) cis4\) | \break
}
The breaks are needed because in the real example there are many notes
in the piano ...
In lines 1 and 2 it is only an ugly collision (probably an instance of
issue #427?)
but lines 3 and 4 (when the slur ends on the first note after the line
break) are really crazy and mess up the page layout of my music completely.
Is this just issue #427 or should one add a new issue?
If not, what about the fact that #427 is abandonde?
I think this is quite an embarassing output.
Best
Ur
_______________________________________________
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
