Kieren MacMillan writes: > Hi all, > >> Just be completely clear, appending \arpeggio as Thomas demonstrated >> (thanks, Thomas) not only "solves" it, it is actually the documented and >> correct usage of \arpeggio. >> >> From the Notation Reference: >> >> http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.17/Documentation/notation/expressive-marks-as-lines#arpeggio >> >> where it says: >> >> "An arpeggio on a chord (also known as a broken chord) is denoted by >> appending \arpeggio to the chord construct" >> >> So, no bug here. > > Makes sense — sorry for the noise! >
No need to apologise. Some future lilypond user having trouble with arpeggio may search the mailing list archive for an answer, find your noise, and be grateful for it. Cheers, Colin. -- Colin Hall _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
