Gilberto Agostinho wrote > I noticed that some of the 32nd-note flags in the flat-flag style seem to > have a layout problem. The flat flags should always match the staff lines > (just like beams do), but in a few cases they are located in between the > staff lines, which looks quite bad. See the minimal example below and look > for the notes marked with an asterisk below them.
Hi Gilberto, There is no checking for straight flags, the beam lengths are just taken from Stem.details.lenghts (optimised for ordinary flags). Looking into Stem.details.lengths, the entry for 32th flags is 4.25. That's why the flags are being placed in between stave-lines. If you set this value to 4.5 (or to 4.0 if you prefer shorter stems), the flat-flags will work as expected: <http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/file/t3887/flat-flags.png> The modified Stem details are: \override Stem.details = #'((lengths 3.5 3.5 3.5 4.5 5.0 6.0) (beamed-lengths 4.26 4.5 4.6) (beamed-minimum-free-lengths 2.83 2.5 2.25) (beamed-extreme-minimum-free-lengths 2.0 1.25) (stem-shorten 1.0 0.5 0.25)) HTH, Torsten -- Sent from: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Bugs-f58488.html _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
