Am 9. November 2018 07:51:05 MEZ schrieb Andrew Bernard
<andrew.bern...@gmail.com>:
>Hi Urs,
>
>Thanks for the tip. It just happened with the first dynamic I added on
>about page seven. Everything fine until then.
>
>Having worked as a UNIX professional developer for a very long time, I
>can
>tell you something equally lunatic sounding. It has a whiff of being
>related to file system buffering, again, crazy as that may sound. I
>have
>the music in one file, and the score/layout in another file. I save the
>music file, and then in Frescobaldi switch to the score file and
>compile.
>If I save both files and compile each one enough times the dynamics
>eventually appear. This is so bizarre I feel like I am in some sort of
>science fiction film. It's almost like the score file has not caught
>the
>write to disk of the music file.
>
>Does this add any light to it?
At least not for me ...
> Why is it only dynamics that go missing?
>Something is playing tricks on me. :-)
>
>I'll test compiling from the command line to eliminate any Frescobaldi
>issues.
That was the first thing I was going to suggest. Using verbose output is the
other.
Urs
>
>Andrew
>
>
>On Fri, 9 Nov 2018 at 16:44, Urs Liska <li...@openlilylib.org> wrote:
>
>> But if you are using Gut or another VCS you should be able to
>identify the
>> first additions that exposed the issue. This *may* give you some
>pointers.
>>
>>
_______________________________________________
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
