czw., 22 lis 2018 o 02:47 David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> napisał(a): > Urs Liska <li...@openlilylib.org> writes: > > For some reason they all point to a not-yet-existent 2.21 documentation. > > That would be broken. The VERSION file currently reads: > > PACKAGE_NAME=LilyPond > MAJOR_VERSION=2 > MINOR_VERSION=21 > PATCH_LEVEL=0 > MY_PATCH_LEVEL= > VERSION_STABLE=2.18.2 > VERSION_DEVEL=2.19.82 > > and VERSION_STABLE and VERSION_DEVEL are the versions that should refer > to installed web sites. Can someone figure out where > MAJOR_VERSION/MINOR_VERSION gets into generated links? >
Thanks for the hint, David! Basia, can you look into this? _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
