Le 17/07/2022 à 18:24, Arno Waschk a écrit :
Well the hairpin thing mm ight be a bug for itself, as it happens with
(for other reasons whatsoever) wanted pagebrakes as well.
Why would that be a bug? It looks just as expected to me.
Hairpins are not the only grobs with such behavior, e.g.,
\version "2.23.11"
{ c'1\tweak breakable ##t \glissando \pageBreak c''1 }
\pageBreak
{ c'1\tweak breakable ##t \glissando \pageBreak c'''1 }
The difference I meant was that a pagebreak could in theory split a
score in separated smaller scores to be compiled in parallel, and that
could be done in very early stage of score processing, as opposed (I
think) to linebreaks.
There isn't all that much of a difference between page breaks
and line breaks in that regard, I think. If you parallelize
with line breaks, the main non-parallelizable thing is page
layout, which you have to parallelize per page. Most stuff
happens before page layout.
Still the idea was mainly to have such parallelizing rather for a
draft or development mode (where you can live with an odd hairpin),
and still having the slow mode as currently for the final run where
you don't want to have compromises in quality anywhere.
Understood.
_______________________________________________
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
