John R. Vanderpool <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> thanx for the reply. that's not what i'm seeing (i don't think at
> least).
Yes, you are right. It is another issue. Please try the following
patch:
Index: src/incremen.c
diff -pur tar-1.15.1/src/incremen.c tar-1.15.1-n/src/incremen.c
--- tar-1.15.1/src/incremen.c 2004-09-06 14:30:42.000000000 +0300
+++ tar-1.15.1-n/src/incremen.c 2005-12-13 01:01:41.000000000 +0200
@@ -216,7 +216,8 @@ scan_directory (struct obstack *stk, cha
: CHANGED_CHILDREN);
}
- if (one_file_system_option && device != stat_data.st_dev)
+ if (one_file_system_option && device != stat_data.st_dev
+ && !name_scan (name_buffer))
directory->children = NO_CHILDREN;
else if (children == ALL_CHILDREN)
directory->children = ALL_CHILDREN;
> another person replied directly and said that --one-file-system and
> --listed-incremental are being now touted as mutually exclusive
No, of course they are not.
Regards,
Sergey
_______________________________________________
Bug-tar mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-tar
