Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
On Mon, Nov 19, 2007 at 06:36:06AM -0800, walt wrote:FreeBSD, NetBSD, linux all define MAXNAMLEN in dirent.h, but not DFly. Is this an oversight or deliberate?Deliberate. It doesn't make any sense and PATH_MAX or NAME_MAX should be used instead. MAXNAMLEN is the historic limitation of FFS, for the archive.
Yes, I see now. This is how linux works around it: # ifdef NAME_MAX # define MAXNAMLEN NAME_MAX # else # define MAXNAMLEN 255 # endif # endif
