At 8:08 PM -0700 1999/8/28, Jethro Tull wrote:
> All Dynamic DNS services that I know of are vulnerable .
Known problem. DynDNS (as it exists today) is inherently
insecure [0]. There are solutions to this problem underway, but
they're not here yet.
So, this is news to anyone?
[0] Which I guess explains why Microsoft has chosen to use it in
Windows 2000. ;-)
--
These are my opinions -- not to be taken as official Skynet policy
____________________________________________________________________
|o| Brad Knowles, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Belgacom Skynet NV/SA |o|
|o| Systems Architect, News & FTP Admin Rue Col. Bourg, 124 |o|
|o| Phone/Fax: +32-2-706.11.11/12.49 B-1140 Brussels |o|
|o| http://www.skynet.be Belgium |o|
\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/
Unix is like a wigwam -- no Gates, no Windows, and an Apache inside.
Unix is very user-friendly. It's just picky who its friends are.
