On Fri, 29 Mar 2024 08:06:01 GMT, Thomas Stuefe <stu...@openjdk.org> wrote:

>> As of [JDK-8325880](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8325880), building 
>> the JDK requires version 17 of IBM Open XL C/C++ (xlc). This is in effect 
>> clang by another name, and it uses the clang toolchain in the JDK build. 
>> Thus the old xlc toolchain was removed by 
>> [JDK-8327701](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8327701).
>> Now we also switch the HOTSPOT_TOOLCHAIN_TYPE from xlc to gcc, removing the 
>> last xlc rudiment.
>> This means merging the AIX specific content of 
>> utilities/globalDefinitions_xlc.hpp and utilities/compilerWarnings_xlc.hpp 
>> into the corresponding gcc files on the on side and removing the 
>> defined(TARGET_COMPILER_xlc) blocks in the code, because the 
>> defined(TARGET_COMPILER_gcc) blocks work out of the box for the new AIX 
>> compiler.
>> The rest of the changes are needed because of using 
>> utilities/compilerWarnings_gcc.hpp the compiler is much more nagging about 
>> ill formatted printf
>
> src/hotspot/share/utilities/globalDefinitions_gcc.hpp line 83:
> 
>> 81:   #error "xlc version not supported, macro __open_xl_version__ not found"
>> 82: #endif
>> 83: #endif // AIX
> 
> Can probably be shortened like this:
> 
> Suggestion:
> 
> #ifdef _AIX
> #if !defined(__open_xl_version__) || (__open_xl_version__ < 17)
>   #error "this xlc version is not supported"
> #endif
> #endif // AIX

followed your proposal.

> src/hotspot/share/utilities/globalDefinitions_gcc.hpp line 103:
> 
>> 101: #endif
>> 102: 
>> 103: #if !defined(LINUX) && !defined(_ALLBSD_SOURCE) && !defined(_AIX)
> 
> I believe this whole section can be removed now.
> 
> At least I have no idea who this is for. What gcc versions does OpenJDK still 
> support, then, beside these platforms. Also, any gcc platform not on linux or 
> bsd would have hit the #error below at line 132.

linux macos and now Aix use this file.

-------------

PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/18536#discussion_r1547677545
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/18536#discussion_r1547681162

Reply via email to