On 5/7/24 01:04, Suchismith Roy wrote:
Hi Thomas
Thank you for the reply. I want to reach out to Erik who was working
on this issue.
@erik.joels...@oracle.com <mailto:erik.joels...@oracle.com> Do you
also propose the same solution as mentioned by Thomas ?
This is an almost 8 year old email thread, so I definitely do not
remember this discussion. From what I can see I only responded to
Volker's counter proposal and added some details on how to solve it that
way, and giving it my blessing as a concept. As I'm not affected by how
this is solved, I don't have a strong opinion on how to do it, but if I
was, I would certainly prefer Volker's solution, with the code still in
the JDK repository, to having to deal with a new 3rd party dependency.
/Erik
I haven’t worked with resolving build dependencies before, so could I
get some guidance on this. May be some old issue that got closed and I
can refer the code ?
Thanks
Suchismith Roy
*From: *Thomas Stüfe <thomas.stu...@gmail.com>
*Date: *Monday, 6 May 2024 at 8:06 PM
*To: *Suchismith Roy <suchismith....@ibm.com>
*Cc: *build-dev@openjdk.org <build-dev@openjdk.org>
*Subject: *[EXTERNAL] Re: JDK-8170635
Not sure if you meant to address this mail to a specific person. I
assume with proposal you mean this:
https: //mail. openjdk. org/pipermail/build-dev/2016-September/017746. html
? If yes, my proposal was to move dladdr out of the OpenJDK code
Not sure if you meant to address this mail to a specific person. I
assume with proposal you mean this:
https://mail.openjdk.org/pipermail/build-dev/2016-September/017746.html ?
If yes, my proposal was to move dladdr out of the OpenJDK code base
into an independent library that would be maintained by IBM,
hopefully, and would be a prerequisite for building the JDK.
If no, whose proposal did you mean?
On Mon, May 6, 2024 at 11:58 AM Suchismith Roy
<suchismith....@ibm.com> wrote:
I wanted to discuss regarding
https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8170635
<https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8170635>.
Do you have any pointers on moving dladdr() for AIX according to
the current JDK23 structure.
I think you had suggested one proposition according to JDK11 ?
Could we get some more pointers on this proposition ?
