On Sat, 25 Nov 2006, Isaac Jones wrote: > I anticipate some objections, because some people _hate_ .lhs, but we > can see how it goes; in that case, they could always use the > user-supplied field to tell cabal layered tools to use the > Setup.Foo.Hs or whatever the user wants.
What about a separate binary, say 'cabal-setup', that calls runhaskell Setup.hs ? _______________________________________________ cabal-devel mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cabal-devel
