On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 10:53:36PM +0200, Berke Durak wrote: > We absolutely need a standard serialization solution. > > I'm thinking of Sexplib of course but it could be another one. The reason > it must be standard is that it's difficult to provide > serialization/deserialization functions outside the imlementation.
It isn't though. There are several serialization modules (sexplib, deriving, ...), all of them are packaged up so using them is a simple 'apt-get' away. > So Sexplib should be a standard extension, or better, it should be included > in the compiler and used for the .cmo/.cmi/.cmxa files. Why? Rich. -- Richard Jones Red Hat _______________________________________________ Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management: http://yquem.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/caml-list Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs
