On Friday 01 January 2010 17:39:15 Basile STARYNKEVITCH wrote: > LLVM is rumored to be a bit faster, but is also rumored to be slow as a > pure JIT (just in time) code generated (w.r.t. to other non Ocaml > implementations - eg SBCL or CLISP common lisp).
Are you saying that LLVM's JIT is slow to generate code or that the code it generates runs slow? > Polyml http://polyml.org/ > is also supposed to be a JIT-ed SML implementation (it is SML not Ocaml). A > few years ago, metaocaml existed, but seems dead today. Walid said that MetaOCaml was going to relive back in August 2008: http://ocamlnews.blogspot.com/2008/07/metaprogramming-with-metaocaml.html?showComment=1217617620000#c4695232398067055037 > Happy new year to everyone! Happy New Year! -- Dr Jon Harrop, Flying Frog Consultancy Ltd. http://www.ffconsultancy.com/?e _______________________________________________ Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management: http://yquem.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/caml-list Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs
