On Wednesday 10 February 2010 22:25:44 Till Varoquaux wrote: > Some (including me) would even argue that it is sad that type > definitions don't use "rec".
Agreed. Less useful than "rec" on function definitions but that would still be useful sometimes. -- Dr Jon Harrop, Flying Frog Consultancy Ltd. http://www.ffconsultancy.com/?e _______________________________________________ Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management: http://yquem.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/caml-list Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs
