I personally don't mind at all how much stuff you stick in camping as
long as camping.rb doesn't require it. Stuff like the sessions are
really nice because you only load them if you need them, which is
important given my cgi environment.
On 23/11/2008, at 8:52 AM, Magnus Holm wrote:
First of all, I must applaud Julik Tarkhanov for great work on
getting Mosquito 2.0-ready. Well done!
However, much code in Mosquito (which is needed for 1.5-support) is
unnecessary in 2.0, and I believe there is better way to structure
it too, so here comes my Mosquito-clone: camping/test. Take a look
at http://github.com/judofyr/camping-test and *please* give me some
feedback!
Yes, I know this is very similar to Mosquito and I actually don't
want camping/test to be a project for itself. I realize that 1.5-
support is pretty important for Mosquito, but I would love if
camping/test could simply be renamed to Mosquito and be *the*
official Camping testing framework. I know it's a lot to ask for,
and I fully understand that you don't like me coming here and take
over your code, so just scream out if you don't like the idea :-)
Another option would be to ship camping/test with Camping (Sinatra
ships with a minimal testing-framework) so all users are getting
testing built-in. I'm however a little afraid of adding more into
Camping; I mean: it should still be micro, micro, micro, and testing
is really needed for tiny apps.
If not, I can always keep this as a separate project/gem, but I
don't like to "compete" with Mosquito and really want this merged
into something!
Oh, and if all of you think this is just crap, I will silently shut
my mouth and no offense will be taken :-)
--
Magnus Holm
_______________________________________________
Camping-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/camping-list
_______________________________________________
Camping-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/camping-list
