ASW would be interesting as that's a very common use case for us and I am
sure many other people.


On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 12:44 PM, Koaps Freeman <koapsfree...@gmail.com>wrote:

> I was initially playing with Erlang, talk about good times, and I just got
> frustrated trying to do things I can do easily in Ruby and decided to fall
> back to Camping which I like a lot.
>
> Then I came across Celluloid (http://celluloid.io/) and with it on JRuby
> you can pretty much take full advantage of all your CPU cores.
>
> Plus it does the 'let it fail' actor model, so when your Camping app
> crashes, it just restarts the actor again.
>
> This can make for a really robust webapp with all the benefits of running
> within a JVM.
>
> I then saw Reel-Rack which made running Camping easier, but I had the
> question of, how good would the performance be with all the overhead of JVM
> - JRuby - Celluloid::IO - Reel - Reel-Rack - Camping.
>
> That's when I started putting together the benchmark project just to see
> how that setup would look against a MRI version of my webapps.
>
> The simple tests don't really do it much justice, I'm starting to play
> with DCell and ZeroMQ, so I might try to come up with some examples where
> JRuby can use all the cores and see how MRI does with the same code.
>
> I also tried to play with Rubinis but ran into install issues with some
> Gems so I decided to stick with JRuby.
>
> I'm also on SmartOS in a Zone and KVM for Linux, so the tests might be
> completely different on a pure linux install on the same hardware, for
> better or worse.
>
> Would be interesting to see but I'm not going to rebuild my server to find
> out, maybe I'll try it in AWS or something.
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 2:53 PM, Tim Uckun <timuc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> Those are fascinating and very surprising results.
>>
>> I thought for sure trinidad would rule over all of them.  The performance
>> of Puma is also very surprising.
>>
>> So do you think there is any reason to use jruby at all given your
>> benchmarks. MRI seems to be pretty good.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Camping-list mailing list
>> Camping-list@rubyforge.org
>> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/camping-list
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Camping-list mailing list
> Camping-list@rubyforge.org
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/camping-list
>
_______________________________________________
Camping-list mailing list
Camping-list@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/camping-list

Reply via email to