Hi, yes, I agree. Let us start referring to this document to give us a common ground. Of course it should not be taken as a dogma but at least one can try to say "as per page xxx of the document, it should look like this and this....".
Thanks a lot for reminding us again about this document. Does anybody have a good "connection" to WHO persons or entities? I am also interested to find any document that explores the idea of a global PID, how it should be designed, dimensioned, etc. If there is no substantial work done yet on this, then we just do it the "care2x way", that is we "just do it". Regards, elpidio On Monday 08 March 2004 12:23, J. Antas wrote: > In order to we all understand each other and start talking about the > same things, I propose the adoption of that guide as the specifications > guide for the Care2x project. For the sake of clarity lets try, in the > future, to refer to each of the Care2x specs by also stating those > numbers (and the page were they may be found). ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id70&alloc_id638&op=click _______________________________________________ Care2002-developers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/care2002-developers
