Hi Michael and all,

I'm also intended to use sync_out or other GPIO to output square wave to control noise source,
I measured 6V for sync_out and GPIO pin 1.5V.

After digging into ROACH2 schematics(page 25 in roach2_rev2_schematics.pdf), I found the differential signal is first converted into single ended by SN65LVDT2 than
buffered out by THS3091. The THS3091 is given a 12V supply.
After a quick look at THS3091 datasheet, it will output about 12V at 50Ohm load with 15V VS and 3V with 5V VS, so 6~7V output is reasonable for 12V power supply(a little lower than expect?).

Can anyone remember why pull the sync_out that high instead of normal TTL or CMOS level? If I want to use it to drive a load which expect TTL or CMOS level, how should I connect them?


Thanks
Yan





------ Original Message ------
From: "Michael D'Cruze" <michael.dcr...@postgrad.manchester.ac.uk>
To: "casper@lists.berkeley.edu" <casper@lists.berkeley.edu>
Sent: 2017-05-12 02:10:26
Subject: [casper] ROACH2 sync_out

Dear all,



I’m planning to use a 0.5Hz square wave, generated from the FPGA and output via sync_out, to eventually fire our cal diode (via much cabling). A quick hardware test today shows the sync_out port driving at circa 7V (!). This is a bit higher than I was expecting. Does this venture as a whole seem like a particularly bad idea to anyone with experience using sync_out? Is this output voltage roughly as expected?



Thanks a lot,

Michael


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "casper@lists.berkeley.edu" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to casper+unsubscr...@lists.berkeley.edu.
To post to this group, send email to casper@lists.berkeley.edu.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"casper@lists.berkeley.edu" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to casper+unsubscr...@lists.berkeley.edu.
To post to this group, send email to casper@lists.berkeley.edu.

Reply via email to