On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 9:45 PM, Jonathan Ellis <jbel...@gmail.com> wrote: > That seems reasonable, although it feels a little weird for X to as G > for a token and be given one that G isn't the primary for.
"for X to ask* G"
On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 9:45 PM, Jonathan Ellis <jbel...@gmail.com> wrote: > That seems reasonable, although it feels a little weird for X to as G > for a token and be given one that G isn't the primary for.
"for X to ask* G"