I do get 7. I wasn't aware it propagates.
The example is simple, the real issue is this bug? breaks a lot of
situations. I have an application which loads a tcp socket wrapper
from XML configuration. But also the same wrapper can be initialized
from runtime parameters. Unfortunately, I cannot override the XML
settings. I hacked around it, but I already hit an issue with to much
components and their quirks.
On Jan 14, 6:02 pm, alwin <alw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> But myParam matches to the ctor parameter for MyClass, but it can't
> convert it to an int. Should this be ignored? I don't know...
>
> Inline dependencies are for 'child' components too afaik.
> What happens if you do
> new { myParam = 7}
> (and put the ${} back in the config)
>
> On Jan 14, 10:11 am, Felix Gartsman <garts...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I get 7 as expected. Also changing new { myParam2 = new MyClass(7)} to
> > new { myParam = new MyClass(7)} I get exception "Cannot convert
> > 'MyClass' to 'Int32'" insted of getting the default registered
> > 'MyClass' and the unmatching parameter ignored.
>
> > On Jan 13, 11:10 pm, hammett <hamm...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > Your code seems right. It all comes down to the precedence order of
> > > overrides vs inline dependencies. The inline dependencies support
> > > seems half-baked..
> > > What happens if you remove the ${} from the config file?
>
> > > On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 9:16 AM, Felix Gartsman <garts...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
>
> > > > Hi,
> > > > Could someone clarify what I'm doing wrong here? As an example
> > > > consider 2 dummy classes:
> > > > internal class MyClass
> > > > {
> > > > private readonly int myParam;
> > > > public MyClass(int myParam)
> > > > {
> > > > this.myParam = myParam;
> > > > }
> > > > public int MyParam
> > > > { get { return this.myParam; } }
> > > > }
>
> > > > internal class MyClass2
> > > > {
> > > > private readonly MyClass myParam2;
> > > > public MyClass2(MyClass myParam2)
> > > > {
> > > > this.myParam2 = myParam2;
> > > > }
> > > > public MyClass MyParam2
> > > > { get { return this.myParam2; } }
> > > > }
>
> > > > I register them via XML:
> > > > <component
> > > > id="MyClassA" type="CastleScratch.MyClass, CastleScratch"
> > > > lifestyle="transient">
> > > > <parameters>
> > > > <MyParam>5</MyParam>
> > > > </parameters>
> > > > </component>
>
> > > > <component
> > > > id="MyClassB" type="CastleScratch.MyClass2, CastleScratch"
> > > > lifestyle="transient">
> > > > <parameters>
> > > > <MyParam2>${MyClassA}</MyParam2>
> > > > </parameters>
> > > > </component>
>
> > > > Now I resolve:
> > > > MyClass2 t = IoC.Resolve<MyClass2>("MyClassB", new { myParam2 = new
> > > > MyClass(7)});
>
> > > > But t.MyParam2.MyParam==5. Why the override fails, or what I'm
> > > > missing?
>
> > > > Felix.
>
> > > --
> > > Cheers,
> > > hammetthttp://hammett.castleproject.org/
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Castle Project Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to castle-project-users@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
castle-project-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
