ProcessRequest is not only about instantiating the controller.you have
filters than needs to run before and after the actions
you have ViewEngineManager in the mix
you need to invoke Rescues if relevant
etc.
etc.
etc.
however there is MonorailHttpHandler and the BaseHttpHandler, that do all
that.
you'd need to have the IRouteHandler return Monorail's http handler
but that is for the url => action mapping.
there's also the other side: action => url creation.
that is, using the api, to supply it with a lambda of a controller action,
that will generate the URL to there (I do not use it personally)
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 5:42 PM, James Curran <james.cur...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
> Diggina a bit further, this may not be that difficult after all.
>
> If we add a framework base class similar to th eone I've attached
> below (hopefully GMail won't mangle it that much), then the code for
> the ProcessRequest method should be fairly simple for someone who is
> familar with the Monorail internals. That would leave handling the
> effect of GetHttpHandler in a virtual method in a derived class, which
> should be fairly straightforward for the "end-user".
>
> namespace Castle.MonoRail.Framework.Routing.MSFT
> {
> using System.Web;
> using System.Web.Routing;
>
> public class MonoRailRoutehandler : IHttpHandler, IRouteHandler
> {
> string Controller { get; set; }
> string Action { get; set; }
> private object[] Parmeteres;
>
> #region IRouteHandler Members
> public IHttpHandler GetHttpHandler(RequestContext requestContext)
> {
> // use requestContext to initialize Controller, Action,
> and Parameter fields
> return this;
> }
> #endregion
>
> #region IHttpHandler Members
>
> public bool IsReusable
> {
> get { return false; } // Until a better answer is determined.
> }
>
> public void ProcessRequest(HttpContext context)
> {
> // Instaniated Controller, and call Action with Paramaters.
> }
> #endregion
> }
> }
>
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 9:33 AM, James Curran <james.cur...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Not without some effort.
> >
> > Here's an article on using it in ASP.NET without MVC:
> > http://aspnet.4guysfromrolla.com/articles/051309-1.aspx
> >
> > Essentially, you would have to create a class which implements the
> > IRouteHandler interface, which mainly involves a method which returns
> > a IHttpHandler object. In ASP.NET, that would be the Page object that
> > you want to run. Hence we would need to make an adapter which would
> > wrap a Controller/Action into an IHttpHandler.
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 6:22 AM, c.sokun <chornso...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Recently I notice there is no improvement over the MonoRail built-in
> >> routing engine.
> >> Is it possible to use ASP.NET MVC routing engine with MonoRail ?
> >> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Truth,
> > James
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Truth,
> James
>
> >
>
--
Ken Egozi.
http://www.kenegozi.com/blog
http://www.delver.com
http://www.musicglue.com
http://www.castleproject.org
http://www.idcc.co.il - הכנס הקהילתי הראשון למפתחי דוטנט - בואו בהמוניכם
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Castle Project Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to castle-project-users@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
castle-project-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
