Hi Krzysztof,
How do we get the original stack trace, you had mentioned it is possible to
do so by calling non-public API.
Thanks,
Swami
On Tuesday, May 15, 2012 7:39:49 AM UTC-4, Krzysztof Koźmic wrote:
>
> ok
>
> keep us posted
>
> @K
>
>
> On 15/05/2012 9:38 PM, Konstantin Alexandroff wrote:
>
> Greetings,
>
> I've tried to isolate the problem really hard but without success, it
> goes rogue totally unexpected. All I was able to get is that it happens
> only at the proxy creation but other circumstances are unknown. I ended up
> moving endpoints configuration to the code, we'll see how it goes now.
>
> Thanks for your help!
>
> K
>
> On Tuesday, May 15, 2012 2:04:42 PM UTC+4, Krzysztof Koźmic wrote:
>>
>> Howdy,
>>
>> Could you try to isolate the issue? A standalone trivial app that you
>> could share that exhibits the problem would really help us understand what
>> the problem is so that we can fix it.
>>
>> At this point I don't really know what might be the cause or solution to
>> it.
>>
>> @K
>>
>> On 11/05/2012 12:35 AM, Konstantin Alexandroff wrote:
>>
>> Hi, Krzystof
>>
>> sorry for delay.
>>
>> Neither services nor any 'operations' are generic in our case.
>>
>> When issue happens, every call to every method of that particular
>> service ends with the same failure. Other services work as usual. Until we
>> restart AppPool. After that, everything works again for days/weeks.
>>
>> If you're saying it's a WCF problem we could try to stress-test it with
>> tracing enabled but It won't be easy due to irregular nature of the
>> situation.
>>
>> We'll also try to drop xml configuration. But apart from that I'm not
>> sure what else we can do.
>>
>> K
>>
>>
>> On Sunday, May 6, 2012 3:19:23 AM UTC+4, Krzysztof Koźmic wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Konstantin
>>>
>>> Are there any generics involved? When the issue happens once, does it
>>> keep happening everytime after that?
>>>
>>> The stack trace is quite misleading here. The exception comes from WCF
>>> itself, and WCFFacility merely rethrows it (which erases original
>>> callstack, unless we force it to preserve it (which requires calling
>>> non-public API).
>>>
>>>
>>> @K
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 05/05/2012 11:05 PM, Konstantin Alexandroff wrote:
>>>
>>> We register our Wcf proxies as
>>>
>>> container.Register(Component.For(t).AsWcfClient(WcfEndpoint
>>> .FromConfiguration("*"))
>>>
>>> Endpoints defined in web.config.
>>>
>>> Everything works great, but once in a while (a week +-) one of the proxies
>>> stops working until AppPool is restarted. Before using WcfFacility we used
>>> similar custom proxying using ChannelFactory building (new
>>> ChannelFactory<T>("*")) without any problem I can recall.
>>>
>>> So the question is, as usual, what could be the source of the problem?
>>> Perhaps it's a configuration issue (lifestyle required?).
>>>
>>> We use Core/Windsor 3.0.0.0.
>>>
>>> In logs we see something like this:
>>>
>>> System.NotSupportedException: Method VoteForDiscussion is not supported on
>>> this proxy, this can happen if the method is not marked with
>>> OperationContractAttribute or if the interface type is not marked with
>>> ServiceContractAttribute.
>>> at
>>> Castle.Facilities.WcfIntegration.Proxy.WcfRemotingInterceptor.<>c__DisplayClass1.<PerformInvocation>b__0(WcfInvocation
>>> wcfInvocation) in
>>> c:\BuildAgent\work\9834359f44c23fee\src\Castle.Facilities.WcfIntegration\Client\Proxy\WcfRemotingInterceptor.cs:line
>>> 53
>>> at Castle.Facilities.WcfIntegration.WcfInvocation.Proceed() in
>>> c:\BuildAgent\work\9834359f44c23fee\src\Castle.Facilities.WcfIntegration\WcfInvocation.cs:line
>>> 44
>>> at
>>> Castle.Facilities.WcfIntegration.RepairChannelPolicy.Apply(WcfInvocation
>>> wcfInvocation) in
>>> c:\BuildAgent\work\9834359f44c23fee\src\Castle.Facilities.WcfIntegration\Client\Policies\RepairChannelPolicy.cs:line
>>> 31
>>> at
>>> Castle.Facilities.WcfIntegration.Proxy.WcfRemotingInterceptor.PerformInvocation(IInvocation
>>> invocation, IWcfChannelHolder channelHolder, Action`1 action) in
>>> c:\BuildAgent\work\9834359f44c23fee\src\Castle.Facilities.WcfIntegration\Client\Proxy\WcfRemotingInterceptor.cs:line
>>> 72
>>> at Castle.DynamicProxy.AbstractInvocation.Proceed() in
>>> c:\BuildAgent\work\8689a06309d1ab0b\src\Castle.Core\DynamicProxy\AbstractInvocation.cs:line
>>> 170
>>> at Castle.Proxies.IWcfChannelHolderProxy_1.VoteForDiscussion(Guid
>>> discussion, Guid argument)
>>> at Foo.Bar.Web.Specific.Discussions.DiscussionManager.Vote(Guid
>>> discussionId, Guid argumentId, HttpContextBase context) in
>>> c:\BuildAgent\work\397ad3340da6dda6\Sources\Bar-Web-Specific\Discussions\DiscussionManager.cs:line
>>> 42
>>> at Foo.Bar.Web.Controllers.DiscussionController.Vote(Guid discussionId,
>>> Guid argumentId) in
>>> c:\BuildAgent\work\397ad3340da6dda6\Sources\Bar-Web\Controllers\DiscussionController.cs:line
>>> 53
>>> at lambda_method(Closure , ControllerBase , Object[] )
>>> at System.Web.Mvc.ReflectedActionDescriptor.Execute(ControllerContext
>>> controllerContext, IDictionary`2 parameters)
>>> at
>>> System.Web.Mvc.ControllerActionInvoker.InvokeActionMethod(ControllerContext
>>> controllerContext, ActionDescriptor actionDescriptor, IDictionary`2
>>> parameters)
>>> at
>>> System.Web.Mvc.ControllerActionInvoker.<>c__DisplayClass15.<InvokeActionMethodWithFilters>b__12()
>>> at
>>> System.Web.Mvc.ControllerActionInvoker.InvokeActionMethodFilter(IActionFilter
>>> filter, ActionExecutingContext preContext, Func`1 continuation)
>>> at
>>> System.Web.Mvc.ControllerActionInvoker.InvokeActionMethodWithFilters(ControllerContext
>>> controllerContext, IList`1 filters, ActionDescriptor actionDescriptor,
>>> IDictionary`2 parameters)
>>> at
>>> Foo.Bar.Web.Specific.Windsor.WindsorActionInvoker.InvokeActionMethodWithFilters(ControllerContext
>>> controllerContext, IList`1 filters, ActionDescriptor actionDescriptor,
>>> IDictionary`2 parameters) in c:\Bu
>>> ildAgent\work\397ad3340da6dda6\Sources\Bar-Web-Specific\Windsor\WindsorActionInvoker.cs:line
>>> 22
>>> at System.Web.Mvc.ControllerActionInvoker.InvokeAction(ControllerContext
>>> controllerContext, String actionName)
>>> at System.Web.Mvc.Controller.ExecuteCore()
>>> at System.Web.Mvc.ControllerBase.Execute(RequestContext requestContext)
>>> at
>>> System.Web.Mvc.MvcHandler.<>c__DisplayClass6.<>c__DisplayClassb.<BeginProcessRequest>b__5()
>>> at
>>> System.Web.Mvc.Async.AsyncResultWrapper.<>c__DisplayClass1.<MakeVoidDelegate>b__0()
>>> at System.Web.Mvc.MvcHandler.<>c__DisplayClasse.<EndProcessRequest>b__d()
>>> at
>>> System.Web.HttpApplication.CallHandlerExecutionStep.System.Web.HttpApplication.IExecutionStep.Execute()
>>> at System.Web.HttpApplication.ExecuteStep(IExecutionStep step, Boolean&
>>> completedSynchronously)
>>>
>>> --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "Castle Project Users" group.
>>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/castle-project-users/-/LftLi19j86kJ.
>>> To post to this group, send email to
>>> castle-pro...@googlegroups.com<javascript:>
>>> .
>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>> castle-project-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>.
>>> For more options, visit this group at
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en.
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "Castle Project Users" group.
>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/castle-project-users/-/XBoOXTYGgTEJ.
>> To post to this group, send email to
>> castle-pro...@googlegroups.com<javascript:>
>> .
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> castle-project-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>.
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en.
>>
>>
>> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Castle Project Users" group.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/castle-project-users/-/mCXG6kVlosAJ.
> To post to this group, send email to
> castle-pro...@googlegroups.com<javascript:>
> .
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> castle-project-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>.
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en.
>
>
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Castle Project Users" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/castle-project-users/-/evhPwk-C-3AJ.
To post to this group, send email to castle-project-users@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
castle-project-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en.
