Matt S Trout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [..] >> for example: first 5.6902, then 5.70_1 then 5.70. From debian point of >> view 5.70 is before 5.6902, 5.70_1 is invalid (so probably should be >> changed to 5.70.01 but then it's after 5.70 so probably should be changed >> into 5.69-5.70pre1 etc.). But this is minor problem, it's only make >> automatic tools blind but always can be changed manualy. > > 5.70_01 IS A DEV RELEASE. So you don't want to be packaging it anyway. > > The _ is required for CPAN to understand it's a dev release. If you want a > different format, feel free to convince the CPAN admins to change that.
I know and I don't want to change it. >>> The next production release will be 5.7000 - what's the problem with that? >> >> But will be tar.gz named Catalyst-Runtime-5.70.tar.gz or >> Catalyst-Runtime-5.7000.tar.gz? It makes difference with automatic >> upgradind tools. > > 5.7000 - dists will be Dist-Name-<version>.tar.gz just like they've always > been, just like every dist installer I've ever used (i.e. EUMM, MI, MB) > builds > them. > > Relax, don't try to package the dev releases, the production release which > actually needs packaging will be fine. I package everything (because I like to have clean system) but I don't upload to debian everything :> eloy -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] jak to dobrze, że są oceany - bez nich byłoby jeszcze smutniej _______________________________________________ List: Catalyst@lists.rawmode.org Listinfo: http://lists.rawmode.org/mailman/listinfo/catalyst Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/catalyst@lists.rawmode.org/ Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/