> How many people decided to take different framework just because
> catalyst doc still.... sucks?
"Sucks" is somewhat hurtful to the many contributers, but whatever, I
see what you mean.
Thanks - it is just what I think when I see flexibility of Catalyst
compared eg. to Rails (=lots of doc & hype but sometimes it lacks quite
simple functionality). In other words - Catalyst is much more better
than first feelings when you look at doc pages.
Here's the mockup that I'm working on:
http://staff.toeat.com/~jshirley/Catalyst/NewSite/
It is like newer freebsd.org, some changes and it can be such
centralized start point of Catalyst world :)
I agree with Jonathan, lets JFDI.
I see the point - I don't want to complain but just make things better.
I will send you my remarks and work on new site, probably the first is
POD converter to make doc pages better.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.hurra-communications.com/
$ o m e t e a m . d e v e l o p e r
Hurra Communications, Krakow/Stuttgart/London/Paris/Madrid
_______________________________________________
List: Catalyst@lists.rawmode.org
Listinfo: http://lists.rawmode.org/mailman/listinfo/catalyst
Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/catalyst@lists.rawmode.org/
Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/
