You are right: "INTEGER [UNSIGNED] [...] java.lang.Integer, if UNSIGNED java.lang.Long". Who would've thought! :-)

I'd appreciate a Jira issue so that we don't forget about it.

Andrus



On Aug 29, 2006, at 3:40 PM, Tobias SCHOESSLER wrote:

For the driver I use mysql-connector-java-3.1.13-bin.jar

here

http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.0/en/connector-j-reference-type- conversions.html

it reads that INT UNSIGNED should map to java.lang.Long. This is fine I
think and it is correct right after creation of the object.

But why is the type of the column java.lang.Integer when I retrieve the
value later via cayenne? Isn't the bug rather to search there?






             Andrus Adamchik
             <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
le.org> To cayenne- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tuesday, 29 cc
             August 2006 13:27
Subject
                                       Re: Problems with MySql id type
             Please respond to         with AUTO_INCREMENT
             [EMAIL PROTECTED]
             bator.apache.org








I don't think that globally changing INT to be mapped to JDBC BIGINT
is a good idea (although this can be done by editing org/objectstyle/
cayenne/dba/mysql/types.xml). What is confusing to me is why the
generated key is java.lang.Long for the INTEGER column. Could be a
MySQL driver bug???

Andrus


On Aug 29, 2006, at 3:15 PM, Tobias SCHOESSLER wrote:

it was mapped as

<db-attribute ... type="INTEGER" length="10"/>

I changed the type to BIGINT and now the PK is always a Long. Great,
thanks. This was hard to guess.

Is the jdbc type mapping messed up for the MySQL Adapter?

When I reverse engineer the db from scratch

INT UNSIGNED is mapped as <db-attribute ... type="INTEGER"
length="10"/>

INT is mapped as <db-attribute ... type="INTEGER" length="11"/>

Could you give me a hint where to change this mapping so I do not
have to
set it to BIGINT manually?

thank you

Tobias





             Andrus Adamchik
             <[EMAIL PROTECTED]

le.org>                                                    To
                                       cayenne-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
             Tuesday,
29                                                cc
             August 2006 11:00

Subject
Re: Problems with MySql id type
             Please respond to         with AUTO_INCREMENT
             [EMAIL PROTECTED]
             bator.apache.org








How is the column mapped in the Modeler? Have you tried mapping it as
BIGINT?

Andrus



On Aug 28, 2006, at 1:22 PM, Tobias SCHOESSLER wrote:


I use cayenne 1.2, MySql. AUTO_INCREMENT ids

the type of the id field in the mysql schema is set to

INT NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT UNIQUE

I create an object of this table with cayenne and commit. I see the
row
inserted ok. When accessing the Id of the object via

      getObjectId().getIdSnapshot().get(this.FOLDER_UID_PK_COLUMN)

in the same DataContext the type of the Object retruned is a Long.
(Though
I would have expected it to be an Integer from the MySql jdbc
documentation)

When I use a fresh DataContext and retrieve the same row the id
object
returned by

      getObjectId().getIdSnapshot().get(this.FOLDER_UID_PK_COLUMN)

seems to be an Integer ?



I tried to set the type to

INT UNSIGNED NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT UNIQUE

which is supposed to be of Long type from the jdbc type
documentation of
MySql.

to force the id object always to be a Long but cayenne still
returns an
Integer when reading  from the db.

any ideas?

thanks













Reply via email to