On 19 Jul 2016 18:17, Joel Rosdahl wrote: > On 12 July 2016 at 12:03, Иван Вайгульт <i.vaig...@gmail.com> wrote: > > In order to enable visual studio build I did full build replica using > > cmake. [...] > > Any feedback from you is desired. > > Thanks for working on this. > > After some thinking I'm positive to getting rid of autotools. Although > I don't find cmake to be very elegant, it feels less bad than > autotools, at least for modern systems. > > Other opinions from list members are welcome!
cmake is often still broken when it comes to cross-compiling (and even native compiles) and library searches. many of its modules do stupid things like check to see if libs can be found in /usr/lib and /usr/lib64 instead of doing link tests. the FindZLIB module still exhibits these and that branch is using that module. conversely, autotools has no such insanity. glancing at the branch: - CMakeLists.txt/*.cmake have inconsistent indentation (tab-vs-spaces) - CMakeLists.txt/*.cmake should have no trailing whitespace - DEVELOPER_BUILD should not default to "on" - `git describe` should not be run when DEVELOPER_BUILD is off - CCACHE_VERSION fallback should not be "unknown" but the release version - USE_OWN_LIBZ would prob be better named like "USE_SYSTEM_LIBZ" -mike
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ ccache mailing list ccache@lists.samba.org https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/ccache
