In theory, what you say is quite sensible.  But there is one interesting
counter example I am aware of.    The fragment tool compound that
eventually gave rise to the clinical compound indeglitazar (
http://www.pnas.org/content/106/1/262.full.pdf) gives a negative shift by
DSF (in our hands):
[image: Inline image 1]

Therefore, this experience taught us to bin compounds that are negative and
positive and follow up on both, prioritizing depending on this and any
other data we might have.    In the end, we don't overthink it and just put
them in other assays and crystallography if appropriate.

Waving my hands around, you might imagine a scenario where the dye itself
binds and stabilizes a folded form of the protein.  If the fragment also
binds AND displaces the dye AND the fragment stabilizes the protein LESS
effectively than the dye, THEN I believe you could have a true binder that
gives a negative shift.

Nick


On Sat, Jul 8, 2017 at 8:30 PM, megha abbey <abbey...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hello,
>
> I am working on DSF to verify if some compounds bind to my protein. I see
> a negative shift of about 3-4 degrees upon ligand addition (dose-response)
> in comparison to the protein alone. I assume that this might be due to the
> binding of compound to the unfolded stated rather than folded protein.
>
> In such a situation where compounds are to be screened with the aim of
> drug discovery, are these negative thermal shift compounds relevant and how
> can they be followed upon, or they should simply be discarded?
>
> Thank you.
>

-- 
[This e-mail message may contain privileged, confidential and/or 
proprietary information of H3 Biomedicine. If you believe that it has been 
sent to you in error, please contact the sender immediately and delete the 
message including any attachments, without copying, using, or distributing 
any of the information contained therein. This e-mail message should not be 
interpreted to include a digital or electronic signature that can be used 
to authenticate an agreement, contract or other legal document, nor to 
reflect an intention to be bound to any legally-binding agreement or 
contract.]

Reply via email to