It is, I think you would agree, unconventional to put a CA label for a
main-chain carbon at positions 13 and 14 (I have never seen such a
thing). But is it wrong ("Incorrect" - as Harry labels it)? In this
case, putting "CHA" in positions 13-15 is unconventional (again, I have
never seen such a thing) - but is it wrong? The official PDB
documentation, according to my reading at least, is not clear.As Harry pointed out the documentation at https://www.wwpdb.org/documentation/file-format-content/format33/sect9.html#ATOM says in the "Details" that it's incorrect. Cheers, Filipe När du har kontakt med oss på Uppsala universitet med e-post så innebär det att vi behandlar dina personuppgifter. För att läsa mer om hur vi gör det kan du läsa här: http://www.uu.se/om-uu/dataskydd-personuppgifter/ E-mailing Uppsala University means that we will process your personal data. For more information on how this is performed, please read here: http://www.uu.se/en/about-uu/data-protection-policy ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link: https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/WA-JISC.exe?SUBED1=CCP4BB&A=1 This message was issued to members of www.jiscmail.ac.uk/CCP4BB, a mailing list hosted by www.jiscmail.ac.uk, terms & conditions are available at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/
