John wrote: > Just as an > equal opertunity that the centos "core members" would want there name on > updated packages. IE "The Package Builder".
umm.... not true. We dont have Packager set on any CentOS4/5 rpms anymore - anything that comes through the buildsystem does not have that. We used to set that a few years back, so we could track buildroots and logs etc, and work out what machine was used for what and who was responsible for the package. I dont mind plastering my name all over the rpms, but CentOS isnt my project and we work within a community of people / developers / users / abusers / moaners. If people want to get the name of who wrote what, all edits are attributed to sources, much like any other wiki is like wikipedia etc -- Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/ : [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
