Hi, just two questions: 1. Is there anything faster than XEN-paravirtualization?
2. Why XEN 5? XEN 3 is quite stable, too. I have 31 DomUs up and running on a single Box - and have a strong feeling that even 60 will run flawless. But: All of them are Para-Virtualized. I have no problem with disk IO-Bottlenecks since my DomUs are not Database-Servers - so there is mostly static information in the filesystems. I see no reason why I should move to KVM. My only limitation is memory, since RAM is not being virtually mapped yet. Kind regards Nils > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: centos-virt-boun...@centos.org > [mailto:centos-virt-boun...@centos.org] Im Auftrag von > Christopher G. Stach II > Gesendet: Freitag, 26. Februar 2010 09:04 > An: Discussion about the virtualization on CentOS > Betreff: Re: [CentOS-virt] moving from Xen to KVM > [...] > Here are a few tips: > > 1. F*** KVM. > 2. Stick with Xen because there is quite a lot of time until > 5 is EOL'd and if you haven't noticed, it's actually a mature > technology. [...] _______________________________________________ CentOS-virt mailing list CentOS-virt@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt
