Once upon a time, Pete Orrall <p...@cs1x.com> said: > > So, at which stage are you in w/ regards to adopting systemd? Are you still > > ridiculing it, violently opposed to it, or have you mellowed to it? > > I've never had to write my own init scripts before so I'm not feeling > the pain of others, but having professionally managed machines running > SystemD for a while now honestly I don't mind it. While the language > used (units, targets) is confusing and documentation could be better, > there are some things I like about it more than SysVInit.
Yeah, the old init script setup was sorely lacking in some areas (especially dependencies). While there were well-written init scripts that were easy to understand, had plenty of configuration options, etc., there were many that were largely unreadable. I like to distinguish systemd-the-pid-1 from systemd-the-project; I generally like systemd-the-pid-1 (it isn't perfect by any means, but I think it is an improvement). On the other hand, I dislike the scope creep and "replace all the wheels" approach of systemd-the-project. -- Chris Adams <li...@cmadams.net> _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
