Nothing against removing drpms. Nuke them. -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux! www.nux.ro ----- Original Message ----- > From: "johnny" <joh...@centos.org> > To: "CentOS mailing list" <centos@centos.org> > Sent: Monday, 25 March, 2019 12:32:33 > Subject: Re: [CentOS] http error when updating 7.5 ==> 7.6 > On 3/25/19 6:37 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: >> On 3/23/19 9:19 AM, Bez Thomas wrote: >>>> On Mar 22, 2019, at 9:52 PM, Fred Smith <fre...@fcshome.stoneham.ma.us> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Was just doing a (very) belated update on a 7.5 system and ran into >>>> this set of errors: >>>> >>> >>>> Some delta RPMs failed to download or rebuild. Retrying.. >>>> >>> >>> >>>> >>>> so, anybody know why we're getting the 416 error from yum but not from >>>> firefox? >>>> >>> >>> Hi Fred, >>> >>> Ran into this yesterday. It seems to be a delta rpm problem. >>> Firefox is working because it’s downloading the whole rpm, avoiding the >>> issue. >>> >>> setting >>> deltarpm=0 >>> in /etc/yum.conf is an equivalent workaround, and fixed the issue for me. >>> >>> I’d appreciate someone who knows more about how delta rpms work weighing in >>> on >>> what the actual issue is. >>> >> >> Not sure what happened with the drpms, but I will regenerate all the >> polkit drpms with the upcoming ghostscript release later this morning. >> >> I added drpm tests to our pre-release CI tests as well. >> > > This is not the first time we have had issues with drpms in the update tree. > > Would anyone be opposed to taking away deltarpms from the repositories? > > They take up lots of space and they have cause multiple issues in the past. > > Thoughts? > > > > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
