On Aug 26, 2008, at 12:36 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote:

On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 10:32 AM, MHR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 5:49 AM, Jim Perrin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Rather than guessing, why not look at the output from the rpm command
he ran, which gives the name of the package he's missing? Filipe
nailed this one a little earlier in the thread with unifdef.x86_64
needing to be installed.

I remember running into this a while back.  That being the case,
shouldn't unifdef be included in kernel-devel, or at least one of the
packages that are required for building a kernel?  Seems like it
sticks out like a sore thumb this way....

Alternatively, how do I go about suggesting this in a formal way
(bugzilla, etc.)?

Alan and I are now talking about this so we can amend the Wiki article
appropriately.  According to him, unifdef is not required on his
32-bit system.  I will update on this subject as soon as I gather more
info.

I've needed it on RHEL 5 systems before I could build the kernel source on 32 bit systems. I probably did with CentOS too, but I don't recall for sure.
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Reply via email to