Robert Heller wrote:
>
>> Seems odd that caching wouldn't just happen naturally in the nfs client.
>
> I am not sure if it even makes sense to cache NFS files on a nfs client
> -- how does the client know that the file might not have changed on the
> server? At the very least it has to check the file mod times on the
> server to be sure its local cache is valid.
Pretty much all filesytems cache, and would be unusably slow if they
didn't. File attributes should be only a few seconds on NFS, but that
should be enough to avoid killing your server.
>> Maybe it is updating the access time on each read or something that
>> causes the activity.
>
> It is either re-reading the files or checking mod times to determin
> if the local cached copy is valid. Either way, lots of traffic.
And this was hundreds of ops/second?
--
Les Mikesell
lesmikes...@gmail.com
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
