On 1/13/2010 9:04 AM, John Doe wrote: > > One thing that made me not use BackupPC was that (from the doc): > "The advantage of the mod_perl setup is that no setuid script is needed, > and there is a huge performance advantage.... The > typical speedup is around 15 times. > To use mod_perl you need to run Apache as user __BACKUPPCUSER__. > If you need to run multiple Apache's for different services then > you need to create multiple top-level Apache directories, each > with their own config file. You can make copies of /etc/init.d/httpd > and use the -d option to httpd to point each http to a different > top-level directory. Or you can use the -f option to explicitly > point to the config file. Multiple Apache's will run on different > Ports (eg: 80 is standard, 8080 is a typical alternative port accessed > via http://yourhost.com:8080)." > > Since I don't have a dedicated backup server, I did not want to mess up the > existing apache configurations...
You really don't spend any time in the web interface which is the only thing affected by this. And it is fast enough when run as a normal CGI anyway. Try it without mod_perl. You'd also have the option of running backuppc as apache, but that is less secure if other web admins have access to the machine. -- Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos