On 02/02/2011 05:22 PM, Larry Vaden wrote: > What is RH's be-all end-all justification for staying with an ancient > code base for such important programs as BIND et al?
Did you ask them ? what did they say ? > Is there any support among the CentOS community for a REPO of current > vintage for such important functions as BIND et al? you mean like the bind97 available in c5-testing right now, that should be in 5.6 soon ? - KB _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
