On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 04:22:36AM +0100, Dag Wieers wrote:
> 
> CentOS 4.8 (95 days late) and CentOS 5.3 (69 days late) have been the worst 
> delays. But now CentOS 5.6 is already at 69 days and CentOS 6.0 is past 
> 133 days delay, an all time record (not counting CentOS 2 :-)).

        You keep tossing out "late".  "late" implies a published deadline
        and I've yet to see one.  I see "best effort" and "will try"
        comments in many places, but never a published deadline.  So,
        why the focus on "late"?




                                                        John

-- 
Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not
sure about the former.
-- Albert Einstein

Attachment: pgpuTQ0cDYklC.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Reply via email to