Nope, no LVM on the RIAD array. It just needs to load right after the main LVM so that something removable doesn't wiggle its way in and mess up the device order.
Yes, the suggestion from Robert H looks promising - working on it now. Did i say i hate udev? I thought there was going to be a replacement for it at some point? - cal sawyer -----Original Message----- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Lamar Owen Sent: 01 April 2011 14:18 To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] Controlling the order of /dev/sdX devices? On Friday, April 01, 2011 04:23:40 am Rudi Ahlers wrote: > Yes, that's why you assign a LABEL to the device :) According to the OP's initial message, I think he's already doing this: >> SATA system HDD /dev/VolGroup00/LogVol00 / >> RAID array LABEL=STORE /store ## mounts == >> /dev/sdb1 But I could be wrong. The issue seemed to be that the udev rule prevented the detection of the LVM on that RAID completely when it came up as /dev/sdd. The other udev rule in-thread seems to be a possible solution; will be interesting to see if it works. _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
