On May 12, 2011, at 2:05 AM, Ron Blizzard wrote: > On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 1:08 AM, Mark Bradbury <mark.bradb...@gmail.com> > wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> Do you expect the C6.0 -> C6.1 differences to be more complex, or less >>>> complex than the C5.5 -> C5.6 differences ? >>>> >>>> And given that C5.6 took 3 months, are there any reasons why C6.1 would >>>> take no more than 1 month ? >>> >>> Get over yourself Dag ... for goodness sake. >>> >>> >>> >> >> Why? seems like a valid point to me. > > But at that time there should only be one point release on the table, > instead of two point releases and one major release. Is everyone > forgetting that 4.9, 5.6 and 6.0 were all out at the same time? ---- I think you are confusing overlap with simultaneous.
• 2011-02-16: Distribution Release: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4.9 • 2011-01-13: Distribution Release: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5.6 • 2010-11-10: Distribution Release: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 2 months elapsed from release of 6.0 before 5.6 and more than another month before 4.9 Hardly qualifies at the same time unless you consider 3 months to be essentially the same time. -- Craig White ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ craig.wh...@ttiltd.com 1.800.869.6908 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ www.ttiassessments.com Need help communicating between generations at work to achieve your desired success? Let us help! _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
