Greetings, On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 8:37 PM, Benjamin Donnachie <benja...@py-soft.co.uk> wrote: > On 16 November 2011 14:02, John R. Dennison <j...@gerdesas.com> wrote: > >> So not only does the overall SNR leave, well, everything to be desired >> but not we are tolerating this type of language? Good job - you've >> made an already useless list that much worse. You rule. > > > As much as I detest people who do this.... +1. >
hmm... "Strom over a teacup" Centos has much larger installed base than "upstream provider". And the _always_ stressed out sysadmins find a vent or two in this list. No Problem with me. This is mostly an "Adult Only" list, I presume (as minors cannot become Linux admins that fast -- What the heck even M$*E's cant get it) of course. So a word should not derail any conversation. Above IMHO, of course. -- Regards, Rajagopal _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
