On Mon, 2012-04-02 at 11:11 -0400, Stephen Harris wrote: > On Mon, Apr 02, 2012 at 04:39:17PM +0200, Peter Eckel wrote: > > network. Security-wise there is no difference as you'll never get smaller > > allocations than /64 per site anyway, so what with respect to filterin > *gigglefit > One of my providers gave me a single(!) IPv6 address. Another one has > subdivided a /64 into multiple /96's (one for each customer). > You might want to rethink the /64 concept!
Yea. The clean delegation of IPv6 address space is a beautiful idea. Now sit back and watch while providers decimate the entire concept. Sigh.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
