On 02/13/2014 11:29 PM, Guangliang Zhao wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Guangliang Zhao <lucienc...@gmail.com>
Looks good. Is there a reason we can't just call
forget_all_cached_acls(inode) directly? Or is it
just so that we have our own complete private ACL
interface? (I have no problem with it, just asking.)
Reviewed-by: Alex Elder <el...@linaro.org>
> ---
> fs/ceph/acl.c | 5 -----
> fs/ceph/super.h | 6 +++++-
> 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ceph/acl.c b/fs/ceph/acl.c
> index 64fddbc..48af0b3 100644
> --- a/fs/ceph/acl.c
> +++ b/fs/ceph/acl.c
> @@ -54,11 +54,6 @@ static inline struct posix_acl *ceph_get_cached_acl(struct
> inode *inode,
> return acl;
> }
>
> -void ceph_forget_all_cached_acls(struct inode *inode)
> -{
> - forget_all_cached_acls(inode);
> -}
> -
> struct posix_acl *ceph_get_acl(struct inode *inode, int type)
> {
> int size;
> diff --git a/fs/ceph/super.h b/fs/ceph/super.h
> index c299f7d..8851dc2 100644
> --- a/fs/ceph/super.h
> +++ b/fs/ceph/super.h
> @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
> #include <linux/wait.h>
> #include <linux/writeback.h>
> #include <linux/slab.h>
> +#include <linux/posix_acl.h>
>
> #include <linux/ceph/libceph.h>
>
> @@ -745,7 +746,10 @@ extern const struct xattr_handler *ceph_xattr_handlers[];
> struct posix_acl *ceph_get_acl(struct inode *, int);
> int ceph_init_acl(struct dentry *, struct inode *, struct inode *);
> int ceph_acl_chmod(struct dentry *, struct inode *);
> -void ceph_forget_all_cached_acls(struct inode *inode);
> +static inline void ceph_forget_all_cached_acls(struct inode *inode)
> +{
> + forget_all_cached_acls(inode);
> +}
>
> #else
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
