I don't need to. Out of the 3,896 used to form the consensus only 64 endorse AGW
The real questions is what proof did you see that convinced you AGW is real. Specifically, like CO2 is a greenhouse gas, I'm not even sure what other theories there are. . On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 10:33 AM, GMoney <gm0n3...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 8:30 AM, Sam <sammyc...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> Science, logic, fact, common sense etc. >> >> BTW, I do not reject the possibility that humans can contribute to >> "climate disruption". >> What I reject is the so-called proof that it exists or it's mans >> doing. When someone presents actual science to back up that theory I >> will have a look. >> > > You have read the hundreds upon hundreds of studies who's findings support > this conclusion, and have deemed every one of them "unscientific"??? > > That's impressive. > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:370741 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
