You can still buy CF5:
http://www.macromedia.com/software/coldfusion/productinfo/faq/general/#p800

-Vern

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jillian Carroll [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 11:27 AM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE: LONG time CF Supporter - About ready to dump CF!
> 
> 
> I can tell you what the haste is... I am looking to install 
> CF on a new
> server... and I can no longer purchase CF 5.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Joe Eugene [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 11:59 AM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE: LONG time CF Supporter - About ready to dump CF!
> 
> 
> Well said.. Whats the haste to go into production with CFMX
> without testing your applications and be comfortable with it.
> 
> Joe
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Robert Everland [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 9:48 AM
> > To: CF-Talk
> > Subject: RE: LONG time CF Supporter - About ready to dump CF!
> >
> >
> > Why not downgrade to 5 and put CFMX into development until you
> > are sure it's
> > rock solid. I have absolutely no issues with CF5, but have 
> had issues with
> > CFMX. You gotta hit Macromedia in the pocketbook if you want to
> > see results.
> > If they know you won't spend money until they fix their 
> issues then they
> > will rush it out faster. I just had a case yesterday where a
> > company we deal
> > with upgraded from 4.5 to CFMX (not sure if it was updated 
> yet) but WDDX
> > reads didn't work and it was screwing up how it was dumping data
> > into wddx,
> > converting bit fileds to boolean.
> >
> > Robert Everland III
> > Web Developer Extraordinaire
> > Dixon Ticonderoga Company
> > http://www.dixonusa.com
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Lee Fuller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 9:41 AM
> > To: CF-Talk
> > Subject: RE: LONG time CF Supporter - About ready to dump CF!
> >
> >
> > Yup.. I know I'm not the only one.  This is something that 
> either wasn't
> > thoroughly tested, is due to a major change in 
> technology-base, simply
> > occuring in too few systems... SOMETHING.  I'm not sure why this
> > isn't been
> > directly addressed and squashed.  But it's not.  And I 
> refuse to go to the
> > board and ask for additional $'s to fix a technology that supports a
> > minority of users.
> >
> > Don't get me wrong.. I LOVE CF.  We use it extensively and I love
> > coding it.
> > Much of our services and support to our clients is based on 
> CF. But this
> > simply is gone beyond the point of "something you have to deal
> > with."  It's
> > now an issue of losing business, time, money... and... MY HAIR!
> >
> > Look forward to your posts later.
> >
> > | I know the feeling. I'm going through the same problems right
> > | now - Currently investigating everything and due to post my
> > | findings later today (they aint amounting to much at the
> > | moment unfortunately).
> >
> >
> >
> > Was just about to go look at that.
> >
> > | See thread: CFMX - I've never seen anything so unstable in my life
> >
> >
> >
> 
> 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists&body=lists/cf_talk
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more 
resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm

Reply via email to