Which isnt free because you have to pay thousand+ extra ----- Original Message ----- From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 10:43 AM Subject: RE: MM Has No Plans to Support Apache 2.0
> Free or not, it's still a business decision that should have been made. > Don't upgrade to something you know that's not going to support your > server side. I have to agree with Matt, I stated this myself last week > as well. > > CFMX is technically free if one had a subscription. > > ~Todd > > On Mon, 11 Nov 2002, Plunkett, Matt wrote: > > > Of course, the logical distinction is that an Apache upgrade is free... > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Matt Liotta [mailto:mliotta@;r337.com] > > > > While I agree with you that Macromedia should support Apache 2.0 for CF > > 5, I disagree with your post. You seem to imply that a normal IT shop > > wouldn't want to upgrade to CFMX until after it matures for a couple of > > years, yet you want to upgrade to Apache 2.0, which is certainly > > immature in comparison to Apache 1.3. > > -- > ============================================================ > Todd Rafferty ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) - http://www.web-rat.com/ | > Team Macromedia Volunteer for ColdFusion | > http://www.macromedia.com/support/forums/team_macromedia/ | > http://www.devmx.com/ - Todd (Moderator / CoFounder) | > http://www.flashCFM.com/ - webRat (Moderator) | > Speakeasy DSL - http://www.speakeasy.net/refer/18280 | > ============================================================ > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in ColdFusion and related topics. http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm
