Thank you for your understanding. Empathy always helps a bit :-)

As for your suggestion, as long as my code is using the QUERY param of the
CFMAIL (instead of doing it one at a time) this will not work. Now in my
query I am having to add all sorts of checks to make sure the address is
valid. I have wasted my whole morning playing games with this tag. One of
these hours now my query will check every possible problem and deliver a
perfect set of approx 6000 email addresses to CFMAIL.

Why should I have to do this when the mail server would do it for me? Nobody
really knows.

Thanks for your help.

Dustin

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Dave Carabetta" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 11:17 AM
Subject: Re: CFMAIL TO param problems with large queries


> >I *am* disturbed with CF because this new attribute validation is
> >*breaking*
> >code that worked before in 4.5.  This validation is unnecessary and is
> >better to be left for the mail server to handle. It is especially a
hassle
> >when you are passing the query parameter to the CFMAIL tag the query
> >contains 6000 records! Now I have to make sure it has no invalid email
> >addresses - it's enough to make you pull your hair out.
> >
>
> I understand your frustration. I, too, just migrated from CF 4.5, and I
> don't recall ever being able to put anything other than a valid e-mail
> address in the TO attribute. In my experience, CF always failed on an
> invalid address. But that's neither here nor there.
>
> As for compatibility with CF 4.5, well that's always a crap shoot, and I
> definitely feel your pain on that front. We just migrated our site from CF
> 4.5 to CFMX 6.0->6.1 and had all sorts of those little quirks to work out.
> The way I looked at it was that Macromedia claimed compatibility with CF 5
> and no earlier, so I just sucked it up and fixed what had to be done.
>
> By the way, you didn't mention whether or not the query suggestion worked?
> Taking care of it at the root instead of len(trim()) tests is more
efficient
> and a cleaner implementation.
>
> Regards,
> Dave.
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Instant message during games with MSN Messenger 6.0. Download it now FREE!
> http://msnmessenger-download.com
>
> 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm?link=i:4:138303
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm?link=t:4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm?link=s:4
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4

Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in 
ColdFusion and related topics. 
http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm

Reply via email to