CFIMAP - I hear you.
And we would use JavaMail to do that too, just like CFPOP.
Anyone know of a more robust JavaMail implementation other than the Sun RI (which we currently use)?
I have never encountered one (free or commercial), which is why we use what we use.
--
Tom Jordahl
Macromedia Server Development
-----Original Message-----
From: Jochem van Dieten [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2004 2:16 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CFPOP and bounced mail
Paul Vernon said:
>> Maybe next time we are adding features to the
>> POP tag, we will take a hard look at making his tag obsolete. :-)
>
> Be my guest... If you need any pointers... drop me a line :)
The best way to make cfx_pop3 obsolete is not by adding features to
cfpop, but by supporting RFC 3501 :-)
Jochem
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fast Unsubscribe]
[User Settings]
- CFMail and some people email c... Andrew Scott
- Re: CFMail and some people ema... Jochem van Dieten
- RE: CFMail and some people ema... Andrew Scott
- RE: CFPOP and bounced mail Tyler Clendenin
- RE: CFPOP and bounced mail Paul Vernon
- RE: CFPOP and bounced mail Tyler Clendenin
- RE: CFPOP and bounced mail Raymond Camden
- RE: CFPOP and bounced mail Raymond Camden
- RE: CFPOP and bounced mail Paul Vernon
- RE: CFPOP and bounced mail Jochem van Dieten
- RE: CFPOP and bounced mail Tom Jordahl
- RE: CFPOP and bounced mail Rob Rohan
- RE: CFPOP and bounced mail Paul Vernon
- RE: CFPOP and bounced mail Tom Jordahl
- RE: CFPOP and bounced mail Rob Rohan
- RE: CFPOP and bounced mail Burns, John
- RE: CFPOP and bounced mail Tyler Clendenin
- RE: CFPOP and bounced mail Paul Vernon